The components I found most compelling in this episode were
the interrelationships in Adnaan’s life.
I found it very interesting how Koenig broke down the relationships
between Adnaan’s religion, his parents, and his girlfriends. Each of these elements individually played a
large role in Adnaan’s life but it was the clashing of two or more that led to
speculation and suspicion about Adnaan’s possible motives for committing
murder. I also think it’s interesting
that the prosecution’s case for what would drive Adnaan to murder was not based
on his actions, but on those of his parents.
The prosecution stated that the Homecoming episode where his parents
confronted him at and took him home from the dance led to the break-up that led
to Adnaan’s feelings of rage. It seems,
in fact, like most of the motives don’t rely on the actions of Adnaan himself
at all, but those of the people he surrounded himself with. Adnaan’s parents disproved of his
relationship with Hae, and promoted a strict faith that did not allow him to
get involved with girlfriends and yet Adnaan was the one painted with the
strict ideology and possessing the conflict between Hae and his religion, when
this was never indicated by his own actions.
It seems almost like Adnaan was judged based on the people around him
and their actions.
I also
thought it was interesting how the prosecution stated that when Adnaan was
allegedly killing Hae, he saw his parents and his religion and all the reasons
they couldn’t be together. This seems to
me like a strange approach. In the
snippet they played of the prosecution saying this, they didn’t say he was
killing Hae because she kept them
from being together, but that his parents
did. I have to wonder after
listening to the rest of this episode where Koenig could not find evidence of
Adnaan being angry or enraged by the break-up if this was strategic, a way to
explain away the lack of rage that Adnaan seemed to have toward Hae.
You're absolutely right then you recognize the elements and relationships thereof that lead to speculations on Adnan's purported motive for the crime. You also note a significant point when you state that the prosecution's case for what would drive Adnaan to murder was not based on his actions. I think what you mean by that is that no actions on Adnan's part in the past contribute to the prosecution's case. It is all speculation, and speculation that relies upon various facets and people in Adnan's life. Is that fair? And what else is the justice system to do with such a dearth of tangible evidence? I'm very intrigued by how the jury even concluded the case so definitely and briskly. Hopefully this will be cleared up in the next few episodes of the podcast.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to separate the parents and Adnan in your blog post but I would like to point out that parents and the community definitely have a heavy influence on the child/teen. Moreover, Adnan did identify with religion, albeit not as strongly as his parents. Yet the significance of religion is not that he necessarily identified with it but that his community and his family, those with whom he associated strongly with, did. It's not his religious zeal that is said to be the motive for the crime, it is his sense that he lost all approbation, respect and honor in his community.
*when not then
Delete